Ramy Zohdy — African Affairs Expert
The Indian Prime Minister’s visit to Israel should not be viewed as a routine diplomatic engagement within the framework of bilateral relations. Rather, it reflects a defining international moment in which global partnerships are being reshaped beyond traditional templates. What we are witnessing is the intersection of two influential actors—one a rising Asian power seeking to consolidate its standing in the 21st-century global equation, the other a regional player whose security and technological footprint extends well beyond its geographic scale.
India, with a population exceeding 1.4 billion and now ranking as the world’s fifth-largest economy by nominal GDP, has in recent years pursued a more assertive and flexible foreign policy. New Delhi has moved beyond the rigid structures of classical non-alignment, redefining it in pragmatic terms that allow it to engage simultaneously with Washington, Moscow, and Beijing, as well as with Gulf capitals and European powers. India’s diplomacy today is guided less by ideological alignment and more by calibrated national interest.
Within this broader recalibration, Israel represents a significant technological and security partner. Bilateral trade has surpassed $7 billion in recent years, with strong cooperation in defense systems, surveillance technologies, unmanned aerial vehicles, and cybersecurity. India remains one of the world’s largest arms importers, while Israel ranks among its key suppliers. A substantial share of Israeli defense exports is directed toward the Indian market, underscoring the depth of strategic cooperation.
However, the significance of the visit extends beyond economic or military figures. It reflects a deeper evolution in India’s Middle Eastern engagement. The region supplies over 60 percent of India’s energy needs and hosts millions of Indian workers whose remittances form a crucial financial backbone for the Indian economy. Maritime security across the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, and the Gulf is therefore not an abstract concern for New Delhi—it is a structural economic imperative. Any partnership with Israel must be understood within this broader regional calculus.
For Israel, India offers strategic depth. Engagement with a power of India’s scale—an influential G20 member with expanding diplomatic weight—provides Israel with both political and symbolic gains. Strengthening ties with New Delhi enhances Israel’s connectivity to Asia and reinforces its efforts to diversify diplomatic alliances amid periodic international criticism.
Yet this relationship does not unfold in isolation. The Middle East remains marked by volatility. The Palestinian–Israeli conflict is unresolved, Gulf alignments are evolving, and broader regional tensions persist. India is navigating a delicate path. It maintains longstanding ties with Arab states, officially supports a two-state solution, and simultaneously deepens cooperation with Israel without overtly entangling itself in regional polarization.
The central question is whether New Delhi can sustain this delicate equilibrium. As security and technological collaboration with Israel intensifies—particularly in sensitive military or intelligence domains—some Arab capitals may express concern. Nonetheless, India appears to rely on the pragmatism of its Gulf partners, many of whom, including the United Arab Emirates, have themselves developed direct relations with Israel in recent years. This evolving regional environment reduces the perception of contradiction and allows India greater diplomatic maneuverability.
From a systemic perspective, the visit is emblematic of a broader transformation in global politics. The international system is gradually shifting toward an incomplete multipolarity, where middle and major powers construct cross-regional networks of interest that transcend old ideological divides. India’s approach reflects a diplomacy of interests rather than rhetoric. It seeks technological transfer, defense industrialization, and diversification of suppliers to reduce strategic dependency.
At the same time, the ethical and political dimensions cannot be ignored. Any partnership with a state involved in ongoing regional conflicts inevitably places its counterpart in a balancing test between declared values and strategic gains. India, which presents itself as the world’s largest democracy, must manage this balance carefully to avoid perceptions that expanding security ties signal indifference to regional humanitarian concerns or a shift toward overt alignment.
Ultimately, the visit signals more than a bilateral encounter—it illustrates the reconfiguration of international relations beyond conventional blocs. Asia and the Middle East are no longer distinct geopolitical theaters; they are increasingly interconnected arenas where energy intersects with technology, security converges with trade, and maritime routes shape political calculations.
India’s ability to preserve balanced relations across the region will determine the durability of its evolving strategy. In today’s world, power is measured not solely by economic scale or demographic weight, but by the capacity to navigate contradictions without succumbing to polarization. Between interests and principles, New Delhi is crafting a form of quiet power diplomacy—maximizing strategic returns while safeguarding its broader regional space in the Middle East.
Israel – Ethiopia.. A Controversial Alignment on the Edge of Legitimacy
